So it makes sense to wait until the next big release before upgrading. You can however continue to use the version you bought without upgrading. The full version of Topaz video Enhance AI is now $199.99 (one year of updates included), and yearly upgrades running at $99. All output will however have a watermark. CostĪs usual, there is a free 30-day trial available on the Topaz Labs website. Besides upscaling and enhancing video, Topaz video enhance Ai also has models for slowing down/speeding up video (interpolating frames) and we’ll soo see a video stabilisation feature as well. This app is designed to help you repair and upscale your old or new video files.Īfter years of development, the software is now at version 2.6.x, with new releases every couple of months. I”m talking about image editing plug-ins like Topaz ‘Sharpen AI’, Topaz ‘Denoise AI’ and Topaz ‘JPEG to RAW AI’. Topaz ‘Video enhance AI’, the subject of this review, brings together many of their photo editing artificial intelligence products. It was quiet around the Texas company for the last couple of years, but they’ve now re-centered their entire business around artificial intelligence image manipulation software. If you’ve ever worked with Photoshop or Lightroom, the name Topaz Labs most probably rings a bell. Haven’t look too much into that, though, as I always use 200x (either 720p to 1440p or 1080p to 4k).Topaz video enhance AI review Introduction If I’m correct it works best like that when using gigapixel, and the algorythm should be the same for VEAI. Also, depending on the resolution of the source and your taget resolution, MAYBE it is best to do the upscaling in steps, like from 480p to 1080p, then 4k (if you want to upscale SD material to UHD). But I always use HQ (now Gaia-HQ) as it’s the one with better results by my judgement and using my videos, it can be different with your videos and taste. What preset you use (Gaia or Artemis) probably depends on what your source material is, so there’s not a ‘recommended setting’. If one thing can be said, though, is that some users have better final results if first only using the 100% denoise/deblock and then upscaling, but that can take up to double the time compared to if you only upscale, more like using a second-pass while encoding video, so you should think what’s better. I had to rollback from 1.2 to 1.1 (1.2 was taking way too long to encode), but in 1.2 using 100% or 200% in resource priority wouldn’t change anything, and anything more than that would result in either the same or crashes.
You can choose what preset (Gaia-HQ ,Gaia-CG, and the Artemis flavours, but artemis still looks like garbage for most cases) it will use and that’s pretty much it.
To be fair, as of now, we don’t have much settings to go.
0 kommentar(er)
